Jago Grahak Jago

Edit Template

AstraZeneca vaccine side effect rare, occurs within a month of getting jab: Ex-ICMR Scientist

May 03,2024 New Delhi: A top Indian medical scientist has asked people not to panic as any side effect of a COVID-19 vaccine is a “rare occurrence”. Former Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) scientist R Ganga Ketkar, who was at the helm of affairs during the COVID pandemic, said symptoms of Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) – a serious adverse event that causes blood clots – can only occur within five to 30 days of receiving a COVID vaccine and not now. This comes as British pharmaceutical major AstraZeneca, which developed Covishield vaccine along with the University of Oxford, has admitted that the vaccine can cause a rare side effect. “The benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks,” Ketkar told ET. “People should not worry as the number of cases are pretty small and TTS develops within 5-30 days after receiving the vaccine and not now.” He said as the number of doses increases, the risk of TTS goes down. “There is no reason to worry at this point in time,” Ketkar added. He said that vaccine developers continue post marketing surveillance, which means that they monitor the safety of vaccines once they reach the market. “One thing people should remember is that whether it is a medicine or vaccine, there will be a rare occurrence of diseases, but one will have to look at the benefits,” he said. AstraZeneca is facing class action suits in the UK over allegations that the vaccine caused death and serious injury, including TTS that causes blood clots and a low blood platelet count. In India, Serum Institute of India manufactured the Covishield vaccine under licence from AstraZeneca. Ketkar said there is a need to clear out myths. “If people worry, they tend to google and get influenced. It is possible if they think in a negative light, childhood vaccination will be hit.” He said that unnecessary “unscientific” messages can only spread further panic in the society, and that should be stopped. According to reports, AstraZeneca has admitted in a legal document that its COVID vaccine “can, in very rare cases, cause TTS”. “In India, Covishield, which was used to vaccinate 90 per cent of India’s population, has done well,” a senior person from the COVID working group told ET, playing down concerns of adverse events, despite the rare risk of TTS. Source: Pharma

AstraZeneca vaccine side effect rare, occurs within a month of getting jab: Ex-ICMR Scientist Read More »

55% Covishield recipients had mild side effects: AMCH study

May 05,2024 Guwahati: A study conducted by physician-scientists from Assam Medical College Hospital (Dibrugarh), supported by ICMR-recognised multidisciplinary research laboratory, has revealed that 55 per cent of Covishield vaccine recipients experienced only minor side effects like fever and headache. These symptoms occurred within a week of getting inoculated with the first dose. Researchers confirmed no long-term adverse effects after a year. “In our study, we found that 55 per cent experienced minor adverse events such as fever, headache, body ache and pain at the injection site. The remaining 45 per cent of the recipients had no adverse events at all. After the second dose, only 6.8 per cent showed minor adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). Most importantly, no participant showed any major adverse events during the entire one year period of study,” said associate professor of pathology at AMCH, Gayatri Gogoi, the principal investigator of the study done in Assam’s Dibrugarh district. The major (serious and severe) adverse events were defined as disabling, rare life-threatening conditions that may lead to long-term problems. “The young individuals had more minor adverse events than the elderly individuals. What is also intriguing to note is that those who had comorbidities or other health conditions showed less adverse events,” she added. The study was conducted from July 2021 when the first Covishield vaccine for the public was introduced and participants were followed up till June 2022 after receiving the approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee to conduct the same. This data of research findings was recently accepted for publication in a well-known PubMed indexed journal named Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. The doctor-research investigators felt the need of sharing the real-time research data from Dibrugarh district, led by Gayatri Gogoi, who is also a renowned cancer researcher, along with Dr Gourangie Gogoi, professor of community medicine at AMCH, Dr Bhupendra Narayan Mahanta, professor of medicine (currently posted at Lakhimpur Medical College Hospital) and Dr Mithu Medhi, professor of microbiology (currently posted at Kokrajhar Medical College Hospital) after completing a study on Covishield vaccine effectiveness and AEFI or side effects. The study design was done in consultation with Dr Biswajyoti Borkakoty, head of Regional Viral Research & Diagnostic Laboratory, Regional Medical Research Centre-NE Region (ICMR), Dibrugarh as nodal officer from this region for the pandemic time. The researchers said during the peak of the Delta variant wave in June 2021, it was found that 61 per cent of the participants had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The remaining 39 per cent were sero-negative, meaning they had not contracted the virus and had received the Covishield vaccine. Regarding the effectiveness or antibody development, 93 per cent remained positive and the antibody level was much higher in case of the vaccinated. Among those participants previously infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus, the first dose of Covishield vaccine acted as booster dose and was enough to enhance high rise of antibody titre in contrast to SARS-CoV-2 uninfected participants. “The final inference was that natural virus infections confer stronger immune responses than Covishield vaccine alone,” said Gogoi. Source: Healthworld

55% Covishield recipients had mild side effects: AMCH study Read More »

Heatwave ignites surge in chronic therapy demand

May 10,2024 New Delhi: Soaring temperatures in many parts of India are fuelling demand for medications that manage chronic conditions. This includes medications for high blood pressure (antihypertensives), cholesterol (lipid-lowering drugs), and blood clotting (platelet aggregation inhibitors). Sales of oral electrolytes and sunscreens are also seeing a surge, according to market researcher Pharmarack. Industry data shows sales of antihypertensive drugs have risen to ₹1,134 crore in April from ₹1,129 crore in March and ₹1,119 crore in February. It recorded ₹13,468 crore in Moving Annual Turnover (MAT) in the 12 months through April 2024. Likewise, sales of lipid-lowering drugs rose from ₹520 crore in February to ₹541 crore in April. Hot and humid weather in various parts of the country is pushing sales of platelet aggregation inhibitors, which work in different places of the clotting cascade and prevent platelet adhesion. Sales of such drugs increased from ₹112 crore in February to ₹114 crore in April. Recent heatwave episodes across the Indian landscape may have led to discomfort in the vulnerable population causing a surge in demand for chronic therapies like antihypertensives, lipid-lowering drugs, and platelet aggregation inhibitors,” Sheetal Sapale, vice president, commercial, Pharmarack told ET. Meanwhile, rising temperatures and the need for hydration management is triggering a twofold increase in oral electrolyte consumption this year. “The concerted efforts of pharmaceutical companies in conducting awareness campaigns have yielded promising results, fostering a proactive approach towards health consciousness among the populace. This push has resulted in a significant double-fold multiplication in oral electrolytes consumption over the past five years, particularly in response to rising temperatures and the need for hydration management,” Sapale said. With prevailing high temperatures, the cosmo derma segment also saw an uptick in both value and unit consumption. In April, buoyed by escalating skincare preferences among consumers, segments such as emollients, protectives, and sunscreens experienced steady growth, as per Pharmarack. Overall, in April, the Indian Pharmaceutical Market(IPM) showed robust growth, reaching a notable value of ₹16,413 crore, marking a 9.2% increase in value compared to a year earlier. On a MAT basis, the IPM demonstrated its resilience, reaching ₹1,99,288 crore with a value growth of 7.3%. Source: Pharma

Heatwave ignites surge in chronic therapy demand Read More »

Covishield side effects: Doctors’ group urges govt to review all Covid vaccines

May 10,2024 New Delhi: In the wake of pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca admitting in a UK court that its Covid vaccine can cause blood clots in rare cases, a group of doctors on Thursday expressed deep concern over the safety of the Covishield vaccine manufactured by the Serum Institute of India. At a press conference, the doctors, under the banner of the Awaken India Movement (AIM), urged the government to review the science behind all Covid vaccines and audit their commercialisation as well as implementation of active surveillance and monitoring mechanism to ensure vaccine adverse events are identified as early as possible. “The government has wholly ignored the rising number of cases of tragic deaths post-Covid vaccination all the while and continues to promote Covid vaccines as ‘safe and effective’, without scientific investigation and invoking epidemiology,” Dr Tarun Kothari, a radiologist and an activist, said at the press conference. The world is learning about a side effect of the Covid vaccine called Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), he said. When the COVID-19 vaccines were being administered, not many people were aware that it was being done without the completion of phase-3 trials. Administration of COVID-19 vaccines was started without the manufacturers having complete information and data on the possible short-term or long-term side effects, or fatalities, said Dr Sujata Mittal, a gynaecologist and oncologist. There is an already low awareness around vaccine injuries, especially in India, she said. Thousands of women reported abnormalities in their menstrual cycles, which was confirmed much later as a side effect of the vaccine in a study published in September 2022, she added. “The Awaken India Movement (AIM) has been collecting details of Covid Vaccine deaths covered by media/social media in India and sharing them with various high authorities of the country since 2021, when the vaccination began. The government has failed to respond to our repeated requests to investigate deaths and debilitation from adverse effects of vaccination,” Dr Kothari said. The AIM urged the government of India to compensate all the victims of Covid vaccines, including their family members, through a mechanism that involves vaccine manufacturers as well. “We also demand establishing fast track courts and vaccine courts to provide swift justice to the vaccine injured and their families,” Dr Mittal said. Besides, active surveillance and monitoring mechanisms should be implemented to ensure vaccine adverse events are identified as early as possible and early treatment protocols must be created and widely publicised so that lives can be saved, she stated. “Review science behind all Covid vaccines and audit their commercialisation,” Dr Kothari said. The United Kingdom-based AstraZeneca has started global withdrawal of its COVID-19 vaccine, which was provided in India as ‘Covishield’ in partnership with the Serum Institute of India, days after it admitted to rare side effects of blood clotting and lowering of platelet counts. The withdrawal has been initiated due to a surplus of available updated vaccines since the pandemic, the company said in a statement. In India, the company’s partner Serum Institute of India said it has stopped the manufacturing and supply of additional doses of Covishield since December 2021 while reiterating that it had disclosed all rare to very rare side effects, including TTS, in the packaging insert in 2021. AstraZeneca had partnered with Oxford University to develop the COVID-19 vaccine, which was sold as Vaxzevria in Europe. Source: Healthworld

Covishield side effects: Doctors’ group urges govt to review all Covid vaccines Read More »

FLiRT, the new COVID variants are circulating fast: All about symptoms, severity

May 06,2024 New Delhi: COVID is still there among us and recently two new variants have been found in the US. Termed as the “FLiRT” these two variants include KP.2 which overtook the JN.1 subvariant of Omicron in recent weeks. As per the latest data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, KP.2 is behind one in four infections nationwide. The other FLiRT variant is KP.1.1 which is also circulating in the US but is less widespread than KP.2. It currently accounts for about 7.5 per cent of infections nationwide, per the CDC. Why the name FLiRT? According to the Infectious Disease Society of America, the nickname ‘FLiRT’ is based on the technical names for their mutations. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has reclassified it as a variant of interest and advised close monitoring. The FLiRT variants are spinoffs of JN.1.11.1. They are a part of the Omicron variant. New COVID variant FLiRT symptoms The symptoms of the new variant are similar to those of other Omicron subvariants, such as sore throat, cough, fatigue, nasal congestion, runny nose, headache, muscle aches, fever, and possible loss of taste and smell, experts have said. “The KP.2 variant (also called JN.1.11.1.2) is a descendant of the JN.1 variant and contains several mutations that are associated with escape from vaccine-mediated immune protection. Preliminary research (not yet peer-reviewed) suggests that the estimated relative effective reproduction number of KP.2 (Re) may be 1.22 times higher than the Re for JN.1,” Infectious Disease Society of America has said in a report. FLiRT, which belongs to Omicron’s JN.1 lineage, is rapidly replacing the previous variant, Eris, in the US, the UK, New Zealand, and South Korea, according to Rajeev Gupta, Director of Internal Medicine at the CK Birla Hospital (R), Delhi. “A recent increase in hospitalisation rates in these countries has been attributed to this variant; however, it has remained a relatively small wave. The overall mortality rate has not increased,” he told news agency IANS. “Fortunately, none of the Omicron lineage is able to induce significant lung damage as delta strain did but limited to the upper respiratory tract. The surveillance and vigilance should be kept for major drift in virus,” Dhiren Gupta, a Pediatric Intensivist at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital told IANS and added that these new strains will keep emerging. COVID-19 preventive measures include practicing good hand hygiene by washing hands frequently with soap and water or using hand sanitizer, wearing masks in crowded or indoor settings, maintaining physical distance from others, avoiding large gatherings, and staying home when feeling unwell. Vaccination against COVID-19 is strongly recommended to reduce the risk of infection, severe illness, and transmission. Additionally, following public health guidelines, such as ventilation in indoor spaces and regular testing, can help mitigate the spread of the virus. Combining these measures provides a comprehensive approach to protecting oneself and others from COVID-19. Source: Healthworld

FLiRT, the new COVID variants are circulating fast: All about symptoms, severity Read More »

Covishield deaths could be more than estimates: Parents

May 09,2024 New Delhi: Amid concerns over thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) – a serious adverse event that causes blood clots and a low blood platelet count, linked to AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine – Serum Institute of India (SII), the maker of the product in India, said that it had disclosed all information about the side-effects in its packaging insert in 2021 itself. Safety of vaccines remained “paramount”, a SII spokesperson said on Wednesday. However, a group of parents who lost their children to alleged adverse effects after taking Covishield, believes the number of deaths or serious injury could be much more in India than the government figures even as more parents join in to fight it out in the court. According to reports, AstraZeneca has admitted in a legal document that its Covid vaccine “can, in very rare cases, cause TTS.” “The number of people who have died due to TTS and other causes from vaccine could be much more than the official figures. A lot of people have got in touch with us and will join the fight,” said Venugopalan Govindan, whose 20-year-old daughter, Karunya, died allegedly from complications related to vaccination. Govindan said the AEFI system is inaccessible to common man to even file an adverse report. “The adverse event facility incorporated in COWIN portal after the judgement in Jacob Puliyel case is not functional most of the time, and when it works, it just takes the entry, and we don’t ever hear back about it,” he said. Govindan said that there is no accountability to study and publish causality within a certain timeframe (adverse events suffered in 2015 are decided in 2023). “Data is consciously not made available in an analysable way.” The parents are in touch with lawyers and discussing their case as they contemplate filing a case against its manufacturer, Serum Institute of India (SII). AstraZeneca is facing class action suits in the UK over allegations that the vaccine caused death and serious injury, including thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). “Many new families have got in touch and will join in the fight,” Govindan added. A senior member of the Covid working group said that the group finished the assessment related to adverse events in 2022 and the number of people dying due to TTS are “extremely low.” A few of these parents had earlier approached court blaming administration of the Covid vaccine for the death of their children. The petition was mainly against the government and the authorities that cleared the vaccines for administration allegedly without proper studies, and SII was not a party in those cases. After AstraZeneca’s admission surfaced, the parents are now hopeful of justice. “As responsible manufacturers, AstraZeneca and SII should have stopped the manufacturing and supply of these vaccines when 15 European countries either suspended or age-limited these vaccines due to the deaths from blood clots that happened in 2021 March, within a couple of months of the rollout of the vaccine,” he told ET. Source: Pharma

Covishield deaths could be more than estimates: Parents Read More »

Consumer Protection Act| Onus To Prove That Service Was Obtained For Commercial Purpose Is On Service Provider, Not Complainant: SC

May 11,2024 The Supreme Court held that the onus to prove that the service was obtained for a commercial purpose under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 lies with the service provider and not the consumer. The Bench reiterated that the Consumer Protection Act is a consumer-friendly and beneficial legislation intended to address the grievances of consumers which could not place a negative burden cannot be placed on the consumer to show that the service available was not for a commercial purpose. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Aravind Kumar observed, “Structurally, there are three parts to the definition of a consumer. We can deconstruct Section 2(7)(i) as a matter of illustration. The first part sets out the jurisdictional prerequisites for a person to qualify as a consumer – there must be purchase of goods, for consideration. The second part is an ‘exclusion clause’ [‘carve out’] which has the effect of excluding the person from the definition of a consumer. The carve out applies if the person has obtained goods for the purpose of ‘resale’ or for a ‘commercial purpose’. The third part is an exception to the exclusion clause – it relates to Explanation (a) to Section 2(7) which limits the scope of ‘commercial purpose’. “Since it is always the service provider who pleads that the service was obtained for a commercial purpose, the onus of proving the same would have to be borne by it. Further, it cannot be forgotten that the Consumer Protection Act is a consumer-friendly and beneficial legislation intended to address grievances of consumer”, the court added. Sr. Advocate Shailesh Madiyal represented the appellant, while Sr. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan appeared for the respondent. The Shriram Chits (India) Private Limited Chit Fund) raised a plea arguing that the complainant company was excluded from availing any remedy as it did not come under the definition of a ‘consumer’ under the Act since the service obtained by the complainant was for a commercial purpose. Source: Livelaw

Consumer Protection Act| Onus To Prove That Service Was Obtained For Commercial Purpose Is On Service Provider, Not Complainant: SC Read More »

Issuance Of First Premium Payment Receipt To Insured Would Provide Presumption Of Policy Acceptance By Insurer: Supreme Court

May 11,2024 In a recent decision concerning insurance law, the Supreme Court observed that the issuance of a receipt of the first premium payment by the insurer would provide a presumption of the acceptance of the policy by the insurer. Reversing the findings of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”), the bench comprising Justices AS Bopanna and CT Ravikumar, while interpreting the terms and conditions of the insurance contract, noted that the risk of the insured is deemed to be covered from the date of the issuance of the first premium amount receipt by the insurer. In the instance case, the respondent/Life Insurance Corporation (“LIC”) denied the claim of the appellant’s husband/insured on the ground that the policy wouldn’t be deemed to come into force from the date of the issuance of the receipt towards the payment of the first premium amount. However, the appellant contended that the policy would be deemed to be commenced from the date of the receipt of the first premium amount payment made to the LIC. The uncontroversial fact was that the first premium towards the insurance policy was accepted and a duly signed receipt was issued by the LIC on 09.07.1996. The cheque issued by the appellant against the payment of the premium amount was encashed on 12.07.1996. The appellant’s husband died on 14.07.1996 and the policy was prepared on 15.07.1996. Taking reference to the case of D. Srinivas v. SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors, the court framed a question as to whether issuance of receipt towards the first premium payment to the LIC would provide a presumption of the acceptance of the policy by the LIC. Rather than strictly interpreting the terms and conditions of the contract, the Supreme Court in the D. Srinivas case laid down a flexible formula for the court to see whether there was a clear indication of acceptance of the insurance. After noting that the LIC has not disputed the issuance of the First Premium Receipt carrying the assurance, the court while relying upon the dictum of D. Srinivas inclined to hold that there exists a presumption of acceptance of the policy by the LIC since the issuance of First Premium Receipt. Source: Livelaw

Issuance Of First Premium Payment Receipt To Insured Would Provide Presumption Of Policy Acceptance By Insurer: Supreme Court Read More »

Delhi HC asks NBCC to return Rs 76L with interest to homebuyer, awards Rs 5L compensation

May 09,2024 New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has asked NBCC to refund over 76 lakh along with interest to a homebuyer after it failed to deliver possession of his flat, bought it 2012, and also awarded compensation of Rs 5 lakh for causing “extreme mental agony”. Justice Subramonium Prasad, while allowing the homebuyer’s petition against NBCC, observed that purchasing a house is one of the most significant investments an individual or a family makes in their lifetime, and it often involves years of savings, meticulous planning and emotional investment, and therefore compensating wronged homebuyers is not just a matter of rectifying past injustices but also about deterring future misconduct. The petitioner, a retired government employee, said he purchased the flat in ‘NBCC Green View Apartments’, a project launched in 2012 for Gurugram, but in spite of paying the entire sale price of over Rs 76 lakh in 2017, the unit was never handed over to him. In the order passed on May 8, the court observed that the petitioner has been deprived of his money for the last 10 years and “structurally defective houses” have been constructed, leaving him in a complete lurch, and NBCC should be “dealt with severely” for reluctance to pay interest on the amount and ensuring the petitioner’s rehabilitation. Taking judicial notice of geometric progression of price of land in the national capital region, the court said the “pittance” offered by NBCC to only return the principal amount was not an offer in the eyes of law and a rent allowance of Rs.12.50/- per sq. ft. for six months was not an adequate compensation. “This court is, therefore, inclined to allow the instant writ petition directing the respondent/NBCC to return the entire amount of money paid by the Petitioners within a period of six weeks from today along with interest @ 12% from 30.01.2021 till today. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been forced to shift accommodation and fend for himself in the last seven years and has been put to extreme mental agony, this court is inclined to direct the NBCC to pay a sum of Rs. 5 lakh to the petitioner,” the court ordered. “This is a classic case of extreme hardships suffered by a home buyer who has been made to run from pillar to post after having spent his entire life savings… Respondent has been exceedingly unfair in treating the home buyers in this manner,” the court observed. NBCC accused the petitioner of “forum shopping”, stating he has already approached the fora under the RERA Act and the Consumer Protection Act, and therefore the petition should not be entertained by the high court. The court said in the present case, the act of approaching various fora stemmed from “desperation” rather than any strategy. The behaviour, it added, arises out of a sense of frustration, helplessness and lack of legal knowledge. “In the present case, the petitioner entered into the agreement way back in the year 2012. In five years, the petitioner has pumped in over Rs 76 lakh. A ‘No Dues Certificate’ has been given to the petitioner. Structural defects have been found out in the construction after certain persons started occupying the flats. Petitioners and several other persons have been left in lurch and have been forced to knock the doors of various forums,” the court said. “Such a person faces financial crunch to ensure proper education to his children and such a situation he has no other option but to knock on the doors of various forums hoping to get relief and in such a situation the contention of the State that the person is guilty of forum shopping cannot be accepted at all,” it added. The court further said that when builders fail to deliver what was promised, they shatter the trust and financial security of homebuyers and put them in a situation where they may face immense stress, anxiety, uncertainty and ultimately be forced to navigate legal channels for seeking recourse. “The emotional toll of living in limbo, uncertain about the future of their investment and the stability of their living arrangements cannot be understated. Compensating wronged homebuyers is not just a matter of rectifying past injustices but also about deterring future misconduct,” the court observed. Source: Economic TImes

Delhi HC asks NBCC to return Rs 76L with interest to homebuyer, awards Rs 5L compensation Read More »

Consumer rights body asks FSSAI to look into allegations about Nestlé adding sugar to baby products

April 19,2024 The Central Consumer Protection Authority has asked the Food Safety and Standards Authority to investigate claims that baby cereal products sold by Swiss food-processing conglomerate Nestlé in India contain added sugar, PTI reported on Friday. The development comes after an investigation by the Public Eye and the International Baby Food Action Network found that Nestlé was selling products with added sugar to low-income countries. Experts maintain that sugar should not be added to foods fed to babies and young children because it is unnecessary and addictive. However, infant cereals and formulas sold in the European market, including Switzerland, Germany, France and the United Kingdom, did not have any added sugar, the investigation found. Public Eye is a Swiss non-governmental organisation campaigning for fair globalisation and the International Baby Food Action Network is a network of public interest groups working to reduce morbidity and mortality among infants and young children globally. In response to the report, Consumer Affairs Secretary and Central Consumer Protection Authority chief Nidhi Khare told PTI that she had written to the Food Safety and Standards Authority “to take cognisance of the report on Nestlé’s baby product”. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has also issued a notice to the Food Safety and Standards Authority about the report. According to the Public Eye and the International Baby Food Action Network report, all 15 Cerelac baby cereal products sold by Nestlé in India contain on average nearly three grams of added sugar per serving. In South Africa too, all Cerelac baby cereals contain four grams or more of added sugar per serving and in Brazil, six out of eight such products sold by Nestlé contain an average of three grams of sugar per serving, they found. On the other hand, infant cereals and formulas sold in the European market did not contain added sugar. In a statement shared with a Nestlé India spokesperson said that the company’s “products manufactured in India are in full and strict compliance with CODEX standards [a commission established by the World Heath Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization] and local specifications [as required] pertaining to the requirements all nutrients including added sugars”. The company added: “Over the past 5 years, we have already reduced added sugars by up to 30%, depending on the variant. We regularly review our portfolio and continue to innovate and reformulate our products to further reduce the level of added sugars, without compromising on nutrition, quality, safety, and taste.” The report by the two organisations also showed that Cerelac wheat-based cereals, meant for consumption by six-month-old babies, contained over two grams of added sugar per serving in India, six grams in Brazil and over five grams in Ethiopia. The same product being sold in Germany and the United Kingdom did not contain any added sugar. Source: Scroll.in

Consumer rights body asks FSSAI to look into allegations about Nestlé adding sugar to baby products Read More »