Jago Grahak Jago

Edit Template

March 2026

90% of banned or recalled products are being sold on digital platforms

World Consumer Rights Day 2026 carries the theme “Safe Products, Confident Consumers”, chosen by Consumers International. This theme is not just timely but urgent. Unsafe and substandard products continue to circulate widely, especially online. A recent OECD review revealed that 87% of recalled or banned products were still available for purchase on digital platforms. This is alarming. It tells us that despite technological progress, consumers remain vulnerable to risks that should have been eliminated long ago. Product safety is not merely about compliance with standards; it is about justice and accountability. Unsafe goods cause injuries, waste resources, and erode trust. Vulnerable consumers in low‑income countries are disproportionately affected, making this both a development challenge and a rights issue. In 2026, the message is clear: safe products are the foundation of consumer rights, and without them, trust in the marketplace cannot exist. Unsafe Products: A Hidden Epidemic I often recall a case from my early advocacy days in India. A family purchased a branded electric iron from a local store. Within weeks, the product malfunctioned, causing a fire that damaged their home. The company initially refused responsibility, citing “consumer misuse.” It took months of pressure from consumer groups before compensation was offered. This anecdote illustrates a larger truth: unsafe products are not isolated incidents. They are systemic failures. From contaminated food and spurious and spurious or Not of Standard Quality (NSQ) medicines to faulty electronics and unsafe toys, consumers face risks daily. The rise of e‑commerce has amplified these risks, as online marketplaces often lack robust mechanisms to filter unsafe goods nor do they take the onus to assure quality and safety. Digital Platforms and Accountability The OECD’s finding that banned products remain online is a wake‑up call. Digital platforms have become the new marketplace, but accountability and transparency has not kept pace. In India, I have seen consumers receive spurious and NSQ medicines ordered online, or toys without safety certifications. These are not minor inconveniences — they are threats to life and health. Platforms must be held accountable. They cannot hide behind the excuse of being “intermediaries.” If they profit from consumer transactions, they must also bear responsibility for ensuring product safety. Governments must enforce stricter monitoring, and platforms must adopt transparent supply chain practices or told to close the marketplace. Product Safety as Public Health Unsafe products are not just consumer issues; they are public health hazards. Consider the case of contaminated baby food in Europe, which led to widespread recalls. Or closer home, the sale of spurious medicines in India’s informal markets. These incidents highlight how unsafe products can undermine entire health systems. When consumers lose confidence in product safety, they also lose confidence in institutions. This erosion of trust has long‑term consequences. It discourages innovation, weakens markets, and ultimately harms economic growth. Safe products are therefore not only a consumer right but a public health imperative. Personal Anecdote: The Power of Advocacy I remember working with a group of students in Delhi who discovered that a popular snack brand contained excessive levels of lead. The campaign, supported by consumer organizations forced regulators to act. The product was recalled, and new safety standards were introduced. This experience reinforced my belief that consumer advocacy works. When citizens demand accountability, corporations and regulators cannot ignore them. But advocacy requires awareness, organization, and persistence. It is not enough to complain; consumers must mobilize themselves strategically and be able to raise the resources to sustain campaign. Global Comparisons: Learning from Others The European Union has set high standards with its General Product Safety Regulation, ensuring that unsafe goods are swiftly removed from the market. The United States enforces product safety through agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). India has strong laws, but enforcement remains inconsistent due to lack of priority by the State Governments and organisations like Quality Council of India (QCI) and Bureau of Indian Standards. We must learn from these global examples. Aligning with international benchmarks will not only protect Indian consumers but also enhance India’s credibility in global trade. Safe products are essential for building consumer confidence in both domestic and international markets. The Role of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) In India, Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been a powerful tool for advancing consumer rights. I recall a PIL filed against misleading advertisements in healthcare, which compelled regulators to tighten oversight. PILs have often filled the gap where enforcement was weak. However, PIL should not be the primary mechanism for consumer protection. Regulators must act proactively, not reactively. PIL is a catalyst, but strong institutions are the backbone of consumer rights. Consumers should not have to resort to litigation for basic protections. Corporate Responsibility Beyond Compliance Corporations must recognize that consumer trust is their most valuable asset. Beyond compliance, they should embed product safety into their business models. Transparent pricing, ethical marketing, and robust grievance redressal systems are not optional — they are essential and mandatory. I often tell business leaders: “Trust is the most valuable asset a company can build.” Companies that proactively protect consumer rights build long‑term loyalty and brand credibility. Those that exploit consumers face reputational damage and regulatory consequences. In today’s competitive market, responsibility is not just a legal obligation — it is a strategic advantage. As I lived in Jamshedpur for 43 years and worked closely with the TATAS, I fondly recall the value system they adopted towards their customers to keep the brand image intact. Emerging Risks: The Next Frontier Looking ahead, three emerging risks demand urgent attention: Digital Monopolies: Tech giants wield enormous influence, and without checks, consumers risk exploitation through opaque algorithms and monopolistic practices. Data Privacy: Consumers often have little control over how their information is used. Strong data protection laws are essential. Greenwashing: False sustainability claims mislead consumers who want to make ethical choices. This undermines both trust and genuine sustainability efforts. India must prepare now with strong laws, vigilant regulators, and empowered consumers. These risks are global, but their impact on vulnerable populations in developing countries is particularly severe.Building Consumer Confidence: A Call to Action On this World

90% of banned or recalled products are being sold on digital platforms Read More »

Playtime or Poison? Harmful & toxic toys in Indian markets

PM Modi’s Call for Safe, Indigenous Toys At the India Toy Fair 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged manufacturers to “make toys that are better for ecology and psychology,” stressing the need for eco-friendly materials, innovation, and self-reliance. He reminded the nation that toys are not trivial—they shape childhood imagination and national identity. In his Independence Day 2024 address, he reiterated that India must not depend on unsafe imports, calling for an Aatmanirbhar Bharat in toys. Yet, despite these warnings, India’s toy market remains dangerously unregulated. Raids, recalls, and seizures continue to expose lead-laden, chemically hazardous, and mechanically unsafe toys flooding shelves and online platforms. The Reality: Unsafe Toys Everywhere Recent enforcement actions reveal the scale of the crisis. Toys with excessive lead, phthalates, and explosion-prone batteries have been confiscated across India. Many were imported illegally, while others were domestically produced with recycled plastics and uncertified dyes. Parents, often lured by low prices, unknowingly expose children to hidden toxins. The result is a silent public health emergency: lead poisoning, hormonal disruption, and fire hazards—all wrapped in bright packaging. Raids and Recalls (2023–2025) Year Location Action Taken Hazard Identified Outcome 2023 Nhava Sheva Port (Mumbai) Customs seizure of Chinese toy consignments Lead paint, phthalates Thousands of toys destroyed; importers fined 2024 Bengaluru & Chennai Product recalls of battery-operated toys Exploding lithium cells Toys pulled from shelves; BIS issued safety alert 2024 Delhi NCR Market raids on local shops Uncertified plastic dolls, choking hazards Hundreds of toys confiscated; traders penalized 2025 Mumbai & Pune Raids on wholesale warehouses Excessive lead, toxic dyes Large consignments seized; criminal cases filed 2025 Online marketplaces Crackdown on uncertified imports No BIS certification, chemical hazards Listings removed; platforms warned of liability Why the Market Is Vulnerable India’s toy sector suffers from weak enforcement of BIS standards, consumer ignorance, and e-commerce loopholes. While BIS certification is mandatory, enforcement is patchy. Small traders bypass rules, importing toys without safety checks. Online platforms, meanwhile, are flooded with uncertified toys shipped directly from overseas sellers. Even domestic manufacturers cut corners, using recycled plastics and uncertified dyes to lower costs. The result is a market where unsafe toys are not the exception but the norm. The Consumer Cost Unsafe toys are not just a regulatory issue—they are a public health crisis. Lead poisoning can cause irreversible brain damage, phthalates disrupt hormones, and faulty batteries pose fire hazards. Children, the most vulnerable consumers, are being exposed daily to risks hidden inside brightly coloured playthings. The World Health Organization has repeatedly warned that no level of lead exposure is safe for children. Yet raids in India continue to uncover toys with lead levels far above permissible limits. Modi’s Vision vs. Market Reality Prime Minister Modi’s speeches have consistently highlighted toys as a sector where India can combine cultural heritage with modern innovation. He has called for toys that reflect India’s traditions, use eco-friendly materials, and meet global safety standards. But the reality is starkly different. The market is flooded with cheap imports that undermine both consumer trust and national pride. Domestic manufacturers, instead of rising to the challenge, often cut corners to compete on price. The gap between vision and reality is widening. What Needs to Change India must act decisively: Stricter Enforcement: Customs and state regulators must intensify raids and impose heavy penalties on violators. Consumer Awareness Campaigns: Parents must be educated to check for ISI/BIS marks and avoid suspiciously cheap imports. Industry Accountability: Domestic manufacturers must invest in safe, eco-friendly materials, aligning with Modi’s vision of an Aatmanirbhar Bharat toy industry. E-commerce Regulation: Platforms must be held liable for selling uncertified toys, with mandatory compliance checks. Call to Action India’s toy industry sits at a crossroads. On one side lies Prime Minister Modi’s vision of a self-reliant, eco-friendly sector that safeguards children. On the other lies the grim reality of toxic imports and unsafe domestic products flooding the market. The choice is stark: either India enforces its standards and protects its youngest citizens, or it risks turning playtime into a silent health hazard. For consumers, vigilance is the first line of defence. For regulators, decisive enforcement is overdue. A good toy should spark imagination—not endanger life. India must act now to ensure that every toy in a child’s hand is safe, sustainable, and proudly made to protect the future. 5 Things Parents Must Check Before Buying a Toy 1. Look for the BIS/ISI Mark Always check if the toy carries the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification. This mark ensures the toy has passed safety tests for chemicals, choking hazards, and mechanical risks. 2. Avoid Suspiciously Cheap Imports If the price seems too good to be true, it probably is. Ultra-cheap toys often bypass safety standards and may contain toxic paints, recycled plastics, or faulty batteries. 3. Check Labels and Packaging Read the packaging carefully. Safe toys should list the manufacturer’s details, age-appropriateness, and safety warnings. Avoid toys with missing or vague labels. 4. Be Wary of Online Marketplaces Many uncertified toys slip through e-commerce platforms. Buy only from trusted sellers and check product reviews. If the toy lacks BIS certification, don’t add it to your cart. 5. Inspect Before Play Before handing a toy to your child, inspect it for sharp edges, loose parts, or strong chemical smells. If it looks flimsy or smells of chemicals, it’s not safe.

Playtime or Poison? Harmful & toxic toys in Indian markets Read More »

INTERVIEW : WAJAHAT HABIBULLAH

WAJAHAT HABIBULLAH, (IAS Retd.) Former and First Chief Information Commissioner, Government of India Mr Habibullah has been a member of the Indian Administrative Service since 1968. During his service, he was the Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Ministry of Textiles and Department of Consumer Affairs. He has authored several books and received the Rajiv Gandhi Award for Excellence in Secularism in 1994. He also received the gold medal for distinguished service from the Governor of Jammu and Kashmir in 1996. He has a Bachelor's degree in history from St. Stephens College, New Delhi and a Master's degree in history from the University of Delhi. Q. Why is product safety still an underestimated issue in India? The difficulty with the Indian economy is it started off as a socialist economy. While there's nothing wrong with a socialist economy and there are successful socialist economies, the history of the Indian economy is that it emerged from a colonial economic heritage into a socialist structure – this means that it was concentrated with the government. Hence, consumers were historically treated as beneficiaries rather than economic drivers. Consequently, they were expected to be grateful for what they got rather than being the ones who dictate what they get. However, the consumer cannot merely be a beneficiary – he is actually the mainstay of the economy. What he buys is what governs the running of the economy. The consumer's preference is the basis of the economic structure in a free economy. It is with the concerted efforts and dedication of various consumer activists and organisations that the concept shifted to putting the consumer at the centre of the economy. We still have to strive to ensure that the consumer gets safe products what the consumer wants, not what the government wants the consumer to get as safe products! Q. What are the biggest gaps in the current product safety ecosystem? India today possesses a reasonably developed institutional framework for product safety and consumer protection, supported by legislation such as the Consumer Protection Act 2019, which has a dedicated chapter on product liability and the presence of multiple regulatory bodies including the recent development in establishing for the first time the Central Consumer Protection Authority are landmark milestones on consumer protection. In that sense, the structural elements of a product safety ecosystem are largely in place. The more pressing gaps lie in how effectively these mechanisms are understood, accessed and utilised. A central challenge remains limited consumer awareness. Despite the availability of legal safeguards, grievance redressal mechanisms and regulatory oversight, many consumers are either unaware of their rights or uncertain about how to exercise them. Institutions cannot function optimally if the very stakeholders they are designed to protect do not actively engage with them. Significant efforts are being made by the Department of Consumer Affairs, regulators and civil society organisations to address this deficit. Yet awareness is not merely about information dissemination; it also involves cultivating confidence and assertiveness among consumers to question unsafe products, report defects and seek remedies when harm occurs. This is because unless a consumer demands safety, quality and accountability, nobody is going to respond. Because naturally, the focus of a capitalist is not to benefit of the consumer. The consumer is only a means by which he can make profits. Therefore, even the capitalist has to be made to realise that he's not going to get any profit unless the consumer is satisfied. It is therefore not enough that consumer protection tools exist – consumers must feel empowered and motivated to use them. Q. Is the product liability framework strong enough to protect consumers? India's consumer protection architecture provides mechanisms intended to hold manufacturers and sellers accountable for defective or unsafe products. Yet, the practical effectiveness of these provisions is closely linked to consumer awareness and the accessibility of the existing redressal systems. A framework may be robust on paper, but its deterrent and corrective value diminishes if consumers are unaware of their rights or hesitant to invoke available remedies. At the same time, consumer participation cannot substitute for strong institutions. For example, the RTI Act contains all the guarantors of consumer protection. But, the consumer must himself be aware of his rights and also of the facilities available to enforce his rights. Once that starts happening, then product liability will also become effective. Q. Are safety failures more due to lack of regulation or weak implementation of existing laws? I wouldn't call it safety failure. I would say that consumer protection to the extent intended has not taken place. But these processes are slow and the economy has to adjust to it. And, if you look back on it, the consumer protection laws only started coming in the 1980s, which is not a very long established legal structure. A fundamental principle is that safety is not a concession extended by the government or industry; it is an inherent right of the consumer. Regulatory institutions, policymakers and market participants must continuously reinforce this understanding. Consider routine retail experiences. If we find that a purchased product is not up to the mark, we can ask to return it. While many stores accept the return, some sellers decline returns or refunds by citing 'store policy'. This is against the law. While commercial policies may govern discretionary returns, they cannot override statutory consumer rights in cases involving defective, unsafe, misrepresented or substandard products. Where a product is genuinely deficient or not as promised, consumers are entitled to prompt appropriate remedies under the law. Q. Why does India still lack a strong product recall culture? Recalls do occur, and there have been instances where manufacturers – Tata Nano is a case in point – have taken corrective action upon identifying defects. Such developments indicate that the foundations of a recall mechanism are emerging within the country's consumer protection landscape. However, recalls remain relatively infrequent and often lack the visibility and systemic consistency seen in more mature markets.

INTERVIEW : WAJAHAT HABIBULLAH Read More »